DETERMINAN RISIKO LIKUIDITAS PADA INDUSTRI PERBANKAN YANG BERKATEGORI TOO BIG TO FAIL DI INDONESIA

Lasty Agustuty, Abdul Rakhman Laba, Muhammad Ali, Muhammad Sobarsyah

Sari


Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mendapatkan bukti empiris dari pengaruh ukuran bank, capital buffer, efisiensi dan kredit macet pada risiko likuiditas. Sampel penelitian adalah Bank Umum Konvensional yang memiliki nilai rasio aset bank di atas 2% dari total aset perbankan nasional (Bank Too Big To Fail) dan menerbitkan laporan keuangan secara penuh selama 2004-2019. Teknik analisis data dalam penelitian ini adalah regresi data panel EViews. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ukuran bank memiliki pengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap risiko likuiditas. Capital buffer memiliki pengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap risiko likuiditas. Efisiensi yang diukur dengan rasio BOPO memiliki pengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap risiko likuiditas. Kredit macet yang diukur dengan rasio NPL memiliki pengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap risiko likuiditas.
.
Kata Kunci : Ukuran Bank, Capital Buffer, Efisiensi, Kredit Macet, Risiko Likuiditas

Teks Lengkap:

Download PDF

Referensi


Acharya, V.V., Pedersen, L.H., Philippon, T., Richardson, M.P. 2011. Measuring Systemic Risk. American Finance Association.

Aggarwal, R., Jacques, K.T. 2001. Assessing the impact of prompt corrective action on bank capital and risk. Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol 25 No. 6

Akhtar, M., Ali, K., Sadaqat, S., 2011. Liquidity Risk Management: A Comparative Study between Conventional and Islamic Banks of Pakistan. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research in Business, Vol. 1, Issue. 1

Anam, A. Khoirul. 2013. Risiko Likuiditas dan Dampaknya terhadap Kinerja Perbankan di Indonesia. Jurnal Dinamika Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Vol. 10, No. 1

Ayomi, S., dan Hermanto, B. 2013. Mengukur risiko sistemik dan keterkaitan finansial perbankan di Indonesia. Buletin Ekonomi Moneter dan Perbankan, Vol. 16. No. 2,

Berger, A and Bouwman, C 2009. Bank liquidity creation, Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 22, No. 9,

Bernanke, B. 2013. Monitoring the Financial System. Speech At the 49th Annual Conference on Bank Structure and Competition sponsored by the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois

Billio, M., Getmansky, M., Lo, A.W., and Pellizon, L. 2012. Econometric Measures of Connectedness and Systemic Risk in the Finance and Insurance Sector. Working Paper, MIT.

Bisias, D., Flood, M., Lo, A.W., and Valavanis, S. 2012. A Survey of Systemic Risk Analytics. Working Paper Office of Financial Research, Department of Treasury

Blancer, N., Mitra, S., Morsy, H., Otani, A., Severo, T. and Valderrama, L. 2013 SystemicRisk Monitoring (SysMoll) Toolkit, A User Guide, IMF working paper

Deelchand, Tara dan Carol Padgett. 2009. The Relationship between Risk, Capitall and Efficiency: Evidence from Japanese Cooperative Banks. ICMA Centre Discussion Papers in Finance DP2009-12.

Diamond, D. W., and Rajan, R. G. 2001. Liquidity risk, liquidity creation, and financial fragility:a theory of banking, The Journal of Political Economy,109,2,p. 287–327.

Ghosh, Amit., 2015. Banking-industry specific and regional economic determinants of performimg loans: Evidence from US States, Journal of Financial Stability, 20, p. 93-104

Ghosh, Amit. 2016. Capital Buffer, Credit Risk and Liquidity Behaviour: Evidence for GCC

Banks, Comparative Economic Studies, pp.1-31

Iqbal, Anjum. 2012. Liquidity Risk Management: A Comparative Study Between Conventional Islamic Bank of Pakistan. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, Vol 12 No 5

Judisseno, Rimsky K. 2005. Pajak dan Strategi Bisnis. Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka

Kaufman, George. G. and K. E. Scott. 2003. What Is Systemic Risk, And Do Bank RegulatorsRetard Or Contribute To It?. The Independent Review, Vol 8. No. 3, ISSN 1086- 1653

Prasetyo, M. I. 2013. Analisis Pengaruh Kecukupan Modal, Kredit Bermasalah, Likuiditas, dan Marjin Bunga Bersih terhadap Risiko Bisnis (Studi pada Bank Umum Swasta Nasional Devisa). Jurnal Aplikasi Manajemen, 11(2), 259-266

Rajan, Raghuram G. 2010. Has Financial Development Made The World Riskier? Jornal of Monet, Credit, and Banking, Vol 2, No. 1

Roubini, Nouriel. 2006. Why Central Banks Should Burst Bubbles. Stren School of Business, NYU and Roubini Global Economics. New York

Schinasi, Garry J. 2005. Preserving Financial Stability, Economic Issues 36, International Monetary Fund.

Singh, Adity and Scott, Hall. 2013. Too Big To Fail Banks, Examining The How of Breaking Up. International Finance Seminar, Harvard Law School. MA.

Singh, A., & Sharma, A. K. 2016. An empirical analysis of macroeconomic and bank- specific factors affecting liquidity of Indian banks. Future Business Journal, vol 2 no 1, pp 40-53.

Sobarsyah, M. 2011. Analisis Kebijakan Risiko Keuangan Dan Sistemik Terhadap Industri Perbankan di Indonesia Yang Berstatus Too Big To Fail (TBTF) – Kasus Pada Bank TBTF di Indonesia. Disertasi Universitas Hasanuddin Makassar


Article Metrics

Sari view : 10 times
Download PDF - 0 times

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1234/mirai.v5i2.646

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.


Flag Counter

Creative Commons License

JURNAL MIRAI MANAGEMENT is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Web
Analytics