Pengaruh Koneksi Politik Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan pada Sektor Perbankan di Indonesia Tahum 2019-2023
Sari
Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menyelidiki bagaimana koneksi politik memiliki pengaruh terhadap kinerja keuangan. Penelitian ini berfokus pada analisis kontribusi dari koneksi politik terhadap kinerja dari keuangan tersebut khususnya di sektor perbankan di Indonesia. Studi ini meneliti sejumlah bisnis terkait perbankan yang tercatat di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) pada periode 2019 hingga 2023, dengan total sampel mencapai 68 perusahaan. Proses pengumpulan data dilaksanakan dengan menggunakan teknik purposive sampling. Studi ini inovatif karena menempatkan fokus yang kuat koneksi politik yang memiliki pengaruh terhadap kinerja keuangan dengan menggunakan program SPSS versi 21, pendekatan untuk menganalisis data, digunakan regresi linier sederhana. Pendekatan regresi linier sederhana digunakan untuk memeriksa data. Metode Studi ini bertujuan untuk mengukur bagaimana koneksi politik mempengaruhi kinerja keuangan. Temuan studi ini menunjukkan bahwa ada hubungan yang jelas koneksi politik dengan kinerja keuangan Sebaliknya, telah dibuktikan bahwa koneksi politik secara positif dan signifikan terhadap kinerja keuangan.
Kata Kunci. Koneksi Politik, Kinerja Keuangan
Teks Lengkap:
PDFReferensi
Agrawal, A., & Knoeber, C. R. (1996). Firm Performance And Mechanisms To Control Agency Problems Between Managers And Shareholders. Journal Of Financial And Quantitative Analysis,31(3), 377–397.
Aguilera, R. V. (2005). Corporate Governance And Director Accountability: An Institutional Comparative Perspective. British Journal Of Management, 16(1), 539–553. Akshita, A., & Sharma, C. (2015). Impact Of Firm Performance On Board Characteristics: Empirical Evidence From India. IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, 4(1), 53–70.
Alfaraih, M., Alanezi, F., & Almujamed, H. (2012). The Influence Of Institutional And Governance Ownership On Financial Performance: Evidence From Kuwait. Institutional Business Research, 5(10), 192–200.
Alin, A. (2010). Multicollinearity. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Wires Computational Statistics, 2(3), 370–374. Allen, F., & Gale, D. (2001). Comparing Financial Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Al-Najjar, B. (2017). Corporate Governance And CEO Pay: Evidence From Uktravel And Leisure Listed Firms. Tourism Management, 60, 9–14.
Anderson, R. C., Mansib, S. A., & Reeb, D. (2004). Board Characteristics, Accounting Report Integrity, And The Cost Of Debt. Journal Of Accounting And Economics, 37(3), 315–342. ASX Corporate Governance Council. (2007). Corporate Governance Principles And Recommendations (2nd Ed.). Sydney: ASX.
Apriyana, A., Siregar, H., & Hasanah, H. (2015). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Efisiensi Biaya Perbankan di Kawasan ASEAN-5. Jurnal Manajemen Teknologi Vol. 14 No. 3, 322.
Ausloos, M., Bartolacci, F., Castellano, N. G., & Cerqueti, R. (2018). Exploring How Innovation Strategies At Time Of Crisis Influence Performance: A Cluster Analysis Perspective. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 30(4), 484–497.
Balatbat, M. C. A., Taylor, S. L., & Walter, T. S. (2004). Corporate Governance, Insider Ownership And Operating Performance Of Australian Initial Public Offerings. Accounting And Finance, 44 (3), 299–328.
Beasley, M. S. (1996). An Empirical Analysis Of The Relation Between
The Board Of Director Composition And Financial Statement
Fraud. The Accounting Review, 71(4), 443–465.
Bonazzi, L., & Islam, S. M. N. (2007). Agency Theory And Corporate Governance: A Study Of The Effectiveness Of Board In Their Monitoring
Of The CEO. Journal Of Modelling In Management, 2(1), 7–23.
Boyd, B. K. (1995). CEO Duality And Firm Performance: A Contingency Model. Strategic Management Journal, 16(4), 301–312.
Brown, L. D., & Caylor, L. C. (2009). Corporate Governance And
Financial Operating Performance. Review Of Quantitative Finance
And Accounting, 32(2), 129–144
Cheng, W., Zhao, J., & Xue, F. (2021). CEO POLITICAL CONNECTION, GOVERNANCE MECHANISMS, AND FIRM PERFORMANCE. International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education, 30(2), 834. https://doi.org/10.24205/03276716.2020.4089
Evalestine Patriarini, W. (2020) ‘Pengaruh Koneksi Politik terhadap Nilai Perusahaan’, E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 30(6), p. 1550. Available at: https://doi.org/10.24843/eja.2020.v30.i06.p16.
Ghozali, Imam. (2018). Desain Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif. Semarang: Yoga Pratama.
Haerani dkk. “Penerapan Prinsip Good Governance pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19 di Kecamatan Segeri kabupaten Pangkajene dan Kepulauan.” Siyasatuna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Siyasah Syar’iyyah 3, no. 1 (2022)
Martin Kyere & Marcel Ausloos, 2021. "Corporate governance and firms financial performance in the United Kingdom," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(2), pages 1871-1885, April.
Polii, et al (2023) ‘PREDICTIVE ABILITY OF FINANCIAL AND NON-FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE FOR FINANCIAL STATEMENT PUBLICATION TIME FRAME : MODERATING ROLE OF COVID-19 PANDEMIC 1 INTRODUCTION The COVID-19 pandemic had a widespread effect on the global economy , resulting in a contrac’, pp. 1–22.
Saleh, M. W., Shurafa, R., Shukeri, S. N., Nour, A. I., & Maigosh, Z. S. (2020). The effect of board multiple directorships and CEO characteristics on firm performance: evidence from Palestine. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 10(4), 637-654. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-12-2019-0231
Saeed, A., Belghitar, Y., & Clark, E. (2016). Do Political Connections Affect Firm Performance? Evidence from a Developing Country. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 52(8), 1876– 1891. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X .2015.1041845
Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sugiyono. 2018. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Supriyono, R.A. Akuntansi Keperilakuan. Yogyakarta: UGM Press, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37531/yum.v8i1.8698
Refbacks
- Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional