Performance Analysis Based on the Balanced Scorecard Approach (Case Study at the Maya Sanur Resort and Spa Hotel)

Ni Putu Vicky Yudiari, Ni Luh Putu Wiagustini, Luh Komang Candra Dewi

Sari


This study aims to analyze the performance of Maya Sanur Resort & Spa using the Balanced Scorecard approach, which encompasses the financial, customer, internal business process, and learning and growth perspectives. The research employed a descriptive quantitative approach, with data collected through questionnaires distributed to customers and employees, as well as secondary data obtained from the company. Data analysis was conducted using a Likert scale and descriptive statistical techniques. The results indicate that the overall performance of the hotel falls within the good category. The customer perspective achieved a score of 3.82, indicating a high level of customer satisfaction and loyalty. The internal business process perspective obtained a score of 3.57, reflecting fairly effective operational performance. The learning and growth perspective scored 3.70, demonstrating favorable conditions in human resource development. Meanwhile, the financial perspective, measured using Return on Assets (ROA), was categorized as very good, with a value exceeding 10 percent. Overall, the hotel's performance index was classified as good and approaching the very good category

Teks Lengkap:

Download PDF (English)

Referensi


Anthony, R. N. (1965). Planning and control systems: A framework for analysis. Harvard University Press.

Armstrong, M. (2014). Armstrong’s handbook of human resource management practice. Kogan Page.

Bardi, J. A. (2017). Hotel front office management. Wiley.

Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. University of Chicago Press.

Brigham, E. F., & Ehrhardt, M. C. (2017). Financial management: Theory & practice. Cengage Learning.

Bernardin, H. J., & Russell, J. E. A. (2013). Human resource management: An experiential approach. McGraw-Hill Education.

Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance, 10(2), 99–109.

Cascio, W. F. (2015). Managing human resources: Productivity, quality of life, profits. McGraw-Hill Education.

Dessler, G. (2015). Human resource management. Pearson Education.

Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crisis. MIT Press.

Dick, A. S., & Basu, K. (1994). Customer loyalty: Toward an integrated conceptual framework. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 22(2), 99–113.

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74.

Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 88(2), 288–307.

Gitman, L. J., & Zutter, C. J. (2015). Principles of managerial finance. Pearson.

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.

Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Harvard Business Press.

Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. Free Press.

Robinson, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2013). Organizational behavior. Pearson Education.

Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Harvard University Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.37531/mirai.v11i1.11962

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.


Flag Counter

Creative Commons License

JURNAL MIRAI MANAGEMENT is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Web Analytics