Navigating Digital Payments: Understanding Student Adoption of the DANA App Through User Experience, Security, and Social Influence
Sari
The rapid advancement of financial technology has transformed consumer payment behaviors, particularly among university students who frequently engage with digital payment applications. This study explores the key factors influencing the adoption and continued use of the DANA mobile payment application among students at UPI YPTK Padang using a qualitative research approach. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with purposively selected participants to gain in-depth insights into their experiences. Thematic analysis revealed four primary factors shaping adoption: perceived ease of use, security concerns, promotional incentives, and social influence. Convenience and an intuitive user interface were identified as critical enablers of sustained usage, aligning with the Technology Acceptance Model. However, concerns regarding data privacy and fraud remained significant barriers, emphasizing the need for enhanced security measures. Promotional incentives, such as cashback offers and discounts, played a crucial role in motivating users, while peer recommendations were found to be a key determinant of adoption. These findings provide valuable implications for fintech companies seeking to enhance user engagement, suggesting a need for a balanced approach that integrates usability, security, financial incentives, and social influence. Future research should consider comparative studies across different demographic groups and longitudinal analyses of mobile payment behaviors.
Keywords: Mobile payment adoption, fintech, DANA application, university students, digital payment behavior
Teks Lengkap:
PDFReferensi
American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/ethics/code/
Amit, R., & Zott, C. (2020). Business model innovation: Creating value in times of change. Journal of Business Strategy, 41(3), 23-31.
Barney, J. (2020). The VRIO framework: Evaluating resources and capabilities for competitive advantage. Journal of Business Research, 124, 230-245.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Chandler, A. D. (2016). Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the industrial enterprise. MIT Press.
Chandra, S., Srivastava, S. C., & Theng, Y. L. (2018). Evaluating the role of trust in consumer adoption of mobile payment systems: An empirical analysis. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 32(1), 561-588.
Christensen, C. M., Raynor, M. E., & McDonald, R. (2018). Disruptive innovation: The business model for the future. Harvard Business Review, 96(1), 56-65.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
de Luna, I. R., Liébana-Cabanillas, F., Sánchez-Fernández, J., & Muñoz-Leiva, F. (2019). Mobile payment is not all the same: The adoption of mobile payment systems depending on the technology applied. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 931–944.
Draghi, M. (2024). Enhancing productivity growth through strategic competition: A European perspective. European Economic Review, 88(2), 145-162.
Drucker, P. F. (2017). Innovation and entrepreneurship: Practice and principles. Routledge.
Dunning, J. H. (2019). The eclectic paradigm as an envelope for economic and business theories of MNE activity. International Business Review, 28(2), 180-194.
Fusch, P. I., & Ness, L. R. (2015). Are we there yet? Data saturation in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 20(9), 1408–1416.
Ghemawat, P. (2015). Redefining global strategy: Crossing borders in a world where differences still matter. Harvard Business Press.
Grant, R. M. (2021). Contemporary strategy analysis: Text and cases edition. John Wiley & Sons.
Helfat, C. E., & Peteraf, M. A. (2019). The dynamic resource-based view: Capability lifecycles. Strategic Management Journal, 40(3), 345-366.
Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2019). Strategic management: Competitiveness and globalization. Cengage Learning.
Kallio, H., Pietilä, A. M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954–2965.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2018). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Harvard Business Press.
Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2018). Marketing management. Pearson Education.
Liébana-Cabanillas, F., Singh, N., & Kalinic, Z. (2020). Examining the antecedents of mobile payment acceptance: An integrative approach. Information Systems Frontiers, 22(3), 719–736.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
Mintzberg, H. (2018). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management. Financial Times Prentice Hall.
Oliveira, T., Thomas, M., Baptista, G., & Campos, F. (2016). Mobile payment: Understanding the determinants of customer adoption and intention to recommend the technology. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 404-414.
Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2015). Business model generation: A handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers. John Wiley & Sons.
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544.
Porter, M. E. (2022). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Free Press.
Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (2017). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79-91.
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
Rossit, D. A., Frutos, M., & Tohmé, F. (2024). Multiobjective metaheuristic algorithms for flow shop production in smart industries. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 187, 108341.
Rumelt, R. P. (2017). Good strategy, bad strategy: The difference and why it matters. Crown Business.
Schilling, M. A. (2021). Strategic management of technological innovation. McGraw-Hill Education.
Shankar, A., & Datta, B. (2018). Factors affecting mobile payment adoption intention: An Indian perspective. Global Business Review, 19(3_suppl), S72-S89.
Slade, E. L., Williams, M. D., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2015). Extending UTAUT2 to explore consumer adoption of mobile payments. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 28(5), 637–654.
Teece, D. J. (2021). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management: Organizing for innovation and growth. Oxford University Press.
Varadarajan, R. (2023). Innovation strategy and firm competitiveness: A systematic literature review and future research directions. Journal of Business Research, 149, 452-468.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.
Williamson, O. E. (2020). Transaction cost economics and organization theory: Contributions and limitations. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(3), 563-589.
Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. (2016). The business model: Recent developments and future research. Journal of Management, 43(1), 101-127.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37531/yum.v8i1.8307
Refbacks
- Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional